The Sabarimala crisis has elicited a widespread response from Hindu-Americans, who are voicing their concerns and frustrations towards what they perceive as a direct assault on their religious practices and beliefs. The crux of the issue centres on a ruling by the Supreme Court of India, which overturned a long-standing tradition that barred women of a particular age group from entering the Sabarimala temple in Kerala, India. This decision was met with intense resistance from devout followers, leading to protests in India and abroad. Among these protestors are Hindu-Americans who view this act as an infringement on their religious rights and traditions. They argue that the court’s verdict not only dismisses the age-old customs unique to each temple but also poses a threat to the very fabric of Hinduism. The distress of these individuals extends beyond the borders of India, reaching the Hindu diaspora in the United States, where expressions of solidarity and calls for the protection of their cultural and religious heritage have emerged.
The Sabarimala temple, devoted to Lord Ayyappa, is nestled amidst the rugged terrains of the Western Ghats in Kerala and bears a rich history and distinct customs that draw millions of devotees annually. The temple is believed to be around 800 years old, and its pilgrimage is unique in that it involves a rigorous 41-day period of austerity, symbolizing the journey towards self-discovery and spiritual enlightenment.
One of the vital traditional beliefs centres around the deity Lord Ayyappa, who is considered in a state of eternal celibacy. The temple’s custom of barring women between the ages of 10 and 50 stems from this belief, signifying respect for the deity’s celibate status.
Additionally, the temple holds significance for its ‘makaravilakku’ festival, a divine event said to be celestial lighting witnessed in the nearby hills, symbolizing the holy presence of Lord Ayyappa. With its deep-rooted traditions and unique rituals, this temple holds an irreplaceable place in the spiritual fabric of Hinduism. It continues to be a beacon of faith for its devotees.
The Incident
On October 17, 2018, Nilakkal, a base camp on the way to Sabarimala, was transformed into a battleground as protestors clashed fiercely with the police over the Supreme Court’s verdict. The protestors, a mix of men and women, blocked vehicles and scrutinized female passengers to prevent them from proceeding to the Sabarimala temple. The situation escalated rapidly, resulting in the Kerala police resorting to a lathi charge (a baton charge) to disperse the crowd.
Several people, including innocent bystanders, journalists, and law enforcement officials, were injured in the ensuing chaos. Protestors set fire to vehicles and hurled stones at police, leaving the area in turmoil. The Kerala police responded by arresting over 2,000 protesters for their involvement in the violent episode.
Subsequently, the Kerala High Court backed the police’s actions, saying they were “only doing their job” and it was necessary to maintain law and order. The court also ordered a clean-up of the protest site and directed the state government to provide all the required amenities to pilgrims. Notably, the court also upheld the Supreme Court’s judgement, stating that any form of gender discrimination at places of worship was unconstitutional. Legal actions against those arrested continued, with charges filed under various sections of the Indian Penal Code for rioting, unlawful assembly, attempt to murder, and criminal conspiracy.
American Hindu Reaction
The Supreme Court verdict and ensuing unrest in Sabarimala sparked intense reactions among Hindu-Americans. Many felt the ruling was an intrusion into cherished religious customs and disrespect towards their faith. Protests and rallies sprouted across several cities in the United States, with demonstrators expressing solidarity with their counterparts in India and demanding the protection of Hindu traditions.
Sunita Viswanath, co-founder of Hindus for Human Rights, expressed concern over the escalating conflict. “It is heartbreaking to see such aggression against a court ruling that aims at promoting equality,” she said. “As Hindu-Americans, it is our responsibility to advocate for inclusivity within our religious spaces.”
On the other hand, staunch traditionalists like Ravi Batra, an attorney and a prominent Hindu-American community leader, stood firmly against the court’s verdict. “Who are we to question ancient customs?” he asked. “These practices have survived countless generations and form the very essence of our faith. The courts should respect and preserve these traditions, not dismantle them.”
A significant protest unfolded in New York’s Times Square, drawing several hundred participants. They held up banners demanding “Protect Sabarimala’s Traditions” and chanted prayers, demonstrating the widespread concern within the Hindu-American community about perceived threats to their religious customs and traditions.
Controversy Over the Verdict
The Supreme Court verdict on Sabarimala Temple provoked controversy, fueling heated debates among factions. On one side, supporters of the ruling lauded it as a significant stride towards gender equality and non-discrimination in places of worship. They argue that religious customs should evolve with the times and respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution. This group includes human rights activists, progressive Hindu groups, and many women who believe the verdict heralds a new era of increased gender parity in religious spaces.
Critics of the judgement, on the other hand, consider the ruling an undue interference in religious matters and a violation of their constitutional right to freedom of religion. They maintain that the court’s intervention disrupts the age-old traditions that form the essence of the temple’s unique spiritual ethos. This faction consists of devout followers, orthodox religious leaders, and the temple’s governing body, who argue the sanctity of traditions should be preserved.
The controversy underscores the complex intersection of gender, religion, and law in India, highlighting the enduring tension between preserving religious customs and promoting progressive societal values. As the debate continues, it’s clear that the Sabarimala verdict marks a significant moment in India’s ongoing discourse on women’s rights, religious freedom, and constitutional law.
Implications for Hinduism
The Sabarimala ruling and the resultant uproar have underscored a perceived threat to Hinduism, especially from certain quarters like the Christian missionary establishment and groups accused of fostering ‘break-India’ forces. Critics within the Hindu community argue that these forces, under the guise of progressive ideals, are undermining the core tenets of Hinduism and eroding its traditional practices. They fear that the push for gender equality in sacred spaces, as seen in the Sabarimala case, is an insidious strategy by these groups to destabilize Hinduism and promote conversions.
The Christian missionary establishment’s role in this perceived threat is especially contentious. Critics contend that missionaries exploit such social fissures to establish their foothold, offering an alternative religious refuge to those disenchanted with traditional Hindu practices. However, supporters of the Christian missionary establishment argue that their work primarily focuses on social upliftment, targeting areas plagued by poverty and a lack of education rather than religious conversion.
The concept of ‘break-India’ forces refers to entities, both domestic and international, believed to be working towards dividing India along social, religious, or caste lines. According to some critics, the Sabarimala controversy has been seized upon by these forces to further their divisive agenda. The narrative of discrimination and violation of women’s rights in traditional religious practices is seen as a tool to engender resentment and fuel societal rifts.
However, it is essential to note that these views are hotly contested. Many argue that advocating for gender equality and social progress does not equate to an attack on a particular religion or its practices. The discourse, thus, continues, reflecting the complexity of religion’s role in contemporary society and the challenges posed by competing worldviews.
Conclusion:
As the Sabarimala issue unfolds, it carries significant implications for the Hindu-American community and the broader discourse on religious freedom and gender equality. The controversy could further polarize society, amplifying divisions between those advocating for reform and those staunchly upholding tradition. Yet, it also presents an opportunity for dialogue and introspection on the intersection of faith and societal values.
The debate may prompt other religious institutions to scrutinize their practices in the foreseeable future, opening avenues for progress and risking further discord. For many Hindu Americans, the controversy resonates beyond the immediate issue of temple access; it catalyzes conversations on the nature of their faith, the preservation of cultural heritage, and the reinterpretation of religious practices in light of contemporary values.
The impact of the Sabarimala verdict on Hinduism is also a reminder of the enduring struggle between change and tradition that is inherent in all societies. It underscores the challenges immigrants face in preserving their religious customs while adapting to their new homes and societal norms. Ultimately, how the Hindu-American community navigates this complex issue could set a precedent for future debates on religious freedom, gender equality, and cultural preservation.
About Post Author
